# Integration of SAMI-pH logger with Spotter Buoy

**URL:** <https://bristlemouth.discourse.group/t/integration-of-sami-ph-logger-with-spotter-buoy/217>\
**Category:** Community\
**Created:** [December 21, 2023, 8:59pm UTC](https://bristlemouth.discourse.group/t/integration-of-sami-ph-logger-with-spotter-buoy/217 "2023-12-21T20:59:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![estackpole](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/bristlemouth.discourse.group/estackpole/32/23_2.png) [@estackpole](https://bristlemouth.discourse.group/u/estackpole)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2023, 5:05am UTC](https://bristlemouth.discourse.group/t/integration-of-sami-ph-logger-with-spotter-buoy/217/5 "2023-12-23T05:05:13Z")

</div>

@Taylor.gill I think you’re on the right track with the bi-mooring idea! I love the stability of a system like that. You’ll need to consider deployment and retrieval strategy, stability on whatever bottom type you have, and assurance that the smart mooring cable or any chain coming from the primary mooring isn’t able to interfere with the sensor mooring. In general, were you thinking of something like this?:

 ![image](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/uploads/bristlemouth/original/1X/a4a8c3d3c083ac8c985d3101ad9b737a60c8ac2a.png)

---

_[View the full topic](https://bristlemouth.discourse.group/t/integration-of-sami-ph-logger-with-spotter-buoy/217)._